This all came as the Baker administration relaxed restrictions on indoor dining and performance venues, and pushed relentlessly to force schools to reopen in person even as coronavirus transmission in most of the state’s counties remained too high for reopening under Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. It came as the Baker administration pushed—over the objections of not just teachers unions but also the Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents and the Massachusetts Association of School Committees—to hold high-stakes standardized testing despite the disruption and trauma of the past year. In fact, many observers link the current strong push to get schools open in person to the push to administer standardized testing.
The slams against teachers for wanting to be vaccinated in their communities came after the Baker administration offered state police vaccinations in their workplaces—exactly what teachers were assailed for requesting weeks later—only to have 30% of state police decline those workplace vaccinations. This was also after the state opened up vaccinations to people who accompanied someone 75 or older to be vaccinated, a move that quickly and predictably led to abuses. But teachers? Screw them.
In his surliness over vaccinating teachers, Baker also repeatedly cited the amount of vaccine available to the state, the implication being that Biden was forcing the state’s hand on teachers while not providing adequate doses. The state was only getting 150,000 doses a week, Baker said, and that wasn’t going to change in any significant way in the month of March.
So it was fascinating when this week, the state announced that rather than the expected 155,000 doses, Massachusetts had gotten 170,000 doses, including 8,000 unexpected one-shot Johnson & Johnson vaccines. But it was more fascinating when a state spokesperson characterized that as a “modest increase” that wasn’t significant. That is, of course, about 10% more than anticipated—depending how you calculate those 8,000 one-dose vaccines—and what was anticipated was already slightly higher than Baker had said just a week earlier would be the weekly amount for the rest of the month.
It feels an awful lot like the Baker administration is so committed to demonizing teachers that it will not admit when things are looking up, vaccine-wise. And then, after all that whining about teachers stealing other people’s doses, the state on Wednesday released a timeline for opening up further eligibility tiers for vaccination, with people age 60 and older and some categories of worker becoming eligible on March 22, just 11 days after teachers supposedly throttled access for the state’s most vulnerable elders.
Meanwhile, Baker’s push to reopen schools in person is happening not just with an overtly hostile approach to teachers, but without consulting school committees and with the barest pretense at concern for equity. Significantly, the state Board of Education votes against mandatory reopening came from the student, parent, and teacher representatives on the board—the members over whose selection Baker had the least control.
As one Cambridge parent and celebrated author tweeted recently:
Tracy O’Connell Novick, a school committee member in Worcester, Massachusetts, wrote a powerful letter to her representatives in the state legislature highlighting both the Baker administration’s power grab on school opening and its lack of care for equity.
“The Commissioner does not have the authority to reverse the state funding law based on his capricious definitions of time on learning, where days until the first week of April can be funded for elementary students, however delivered, but cannot be funded after the first week of April, if delivered other than he dictates. Yet, as you know, this is just what he has explicitly threatened,” she wrote.
The effects of those funding threats will fall much harder on some school districts than on others, she continued, specifically on districts that “have many more students who are Black or Latino, many more students who are learning English, and many more students who are poor.” And while the state education commissioner has held out the prospect of waivers for schools that can’t meet whatever politically motivated standards of safety he chooses to embrace at that time, “If the state is making policy that requires waivers for the largest, brownest, poorest, districts, then the state is making inequitable policies, and the Department should clearly be told that it needs to start over.”
The coronavirus pandemic has revealed just how weak Charlie Baker’s claim to being a good manager is. There was the day in early March he told the people of Massachusetts not to worry and then headed to the airport for a ski vacation while the state lost a week in the fight, ultimately becoming one of the national if not global epicenters of the virus. There’s been so much conflicting messaging, with schools pressured to reopen and even as Baker moralized about social distancing in other settings (without putting into place the tough restrictions that might have enabled schools to go in-person safely). The early weeks of vaccine distribution—here in the state where vaccine maker Moderna is headquartered—were a shambles, as Baker abandoned a mass vaccination plan the state had spent decades refining and hired start-up companies to run mass vaccination sites on no-bid contracts. Public health leaders across the state say the process has poorly served their communities and wasted millions of dollars. The state’s vaccine sign-up website crashed on the day eligibility opened up to people 65 and older.
It’s been one form of mismanagement after another from a guy whose brand was amiable technocrat. And always, always, Baker has turned to demonizing and scapegoating teachers to distract from his own failures.