“We find this video to be highly offensive and understand it is painful for many to watch, including many in Trust & Safety and especially given the ongoing violence against the Asian community,” YouTube executives wrote in an email, according to a copy obtained by Bloomberg.
“While we debated this decision at length amongst our policy experts, we made the difficult decision to leave the video up to enforce our policy consistently and avoid setting a precedent that may lead to us having to remove a lot of other music on YouTube,” the letter continued.
While YouTube maintains that the song does not pose a threat to a community and is an artistic expression that does not violate its hate speech policy, it maintained that it’s still open to hearing from employees on their thoughts.
“YouTube has an open culture and employees are encouraged to share their views, even when they disagree with a decision,” a YouTube spokeswoman told Bloomberg. “We’ll continue this dialogue as part of our ongoing work to balance openness with protecting the YouTube community at large.”
In the past year, YouTube has removed more than 97,000 videos and more than 46 million comments that allegedly violated the company’s policies on hate speech. However, individuals have noticed that some comments and videos that target one group are removed faster than others.
This sheds light on the growing debate that many large companies favor one community over the other or hop the bandwagon of removing racist speech or rhetoric when it may negatively impact their brand imaging. In light of the increasing Black Lives Matter protests last year, many companies began issuing statements and removing content they otherwise had not following calls for big corporations to take a stand. Additionally, after the Capitol insurrection in January, many companies began revisiting their relationships with known hate groups or individuals involved in such activities while claiming that such involvement was always in their community guidelines, Daily Kos reported.
The timing of when companies decided to act on the requests politicians and activists have been making for years is interesting and goes to show that companies do have the power to make a change, but refuse to do so unless it’s convenient. YouTube refusing to remove a song employees have referenced as racist is not okay. Just because some individuals, most likely those who do not identify as part of the community in question, believe something is okay does not mean it is not hateful.
According to Daily Kos, reports examining the link between hate rhetoric and anti-Asian bias found that discrimination against the Asian American community increased after the use of xenophobic terms. As such, songs like “Meet the Flockers” contribute to a stereotype that ultimately puts AAPI community members in danger.
Local news reports have repeatedly cited violence in different communities following the spread of misinformation and myths, including that AAPI community members keep valuables in their homes. Multiple burglaries have targeted these community members as a result. Stereotypes have an impact and contribute to the ideology that often perpetuates hate and violence. An obscure song claiming that Chinese people “don’t believe in bank accounts” can put Asian Americans in danger.
We must do better as Americans to address every form of violence that may be present in the community. We cannot let things go by assuming they are small and not realizing the larger impact they may have on the community. Hate speech cannot and should not be tolerated in any form or amount.