Some of Turkey’s biggest banks are reluctant to finance President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s planned Istanbul canal due to environmental concerns and the investment risks hanging over the massive construction project, four senior bankers told Reuters news agency.
Two of the sources said a global sustainability pact that six of Turkey’s top banks have signed was a barrier to funding the Kanal Istanbul, which Erdogan dubbed his “crazy project” when he floated it a decade ago.
The government expects to break ground in June on the canal, which would connect the Black Sea to the north with the Marmara Sea to the south and which would run 45km (28 miles) through marshland, farms and towns on the western edge of the city.
Erdogan says the canal would protect the Bosphorus Strait, which runs through the heart of Istanbul, by diverting traffic.
Yet Istanbul’s mayor, engineers – and, according to one poll, most citizens – oppose the project on environmental grounds, saying it would destroy a marine ecosystem and resources that supply almost a third of the city’s fresh water.
Russia, meanwhile, has signalled unease about the project on security grounds as the canal would open a second passage to the Black Sea, which is home to a Russian naval fleet.
“I don’t think we can take part in the funding of Kanal Istanbul,” said a senior banker who requested anonymity. “It may trigger some environmental issues.”
Six Turkish banks, including Garanti Bank, Is Bank and Yapi Kredi, have signed the United Nations-backed Principles for Responsible Banking framework, which calls on signatories to avoid harming people and the planet.
“Definitely we don’t want to give a loan to this kind of project because of the environmental issues,” a second senior banker told Reuters, adding that signatory banks must abide by the UN-backed sustainability pact.
In 2019, the canal’s price tag was estimated at 75 billion lira – or $13bn at the time – in a government report.
The reluctance of some Turkish lenders to finance the project makes it more likely that state and foreign financing will have to play a bigger role for Erdogan’s dream to come true.
A Finance Ministry spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Asked whether Turkish banks would participate in the financing, Erdogan’s spokesman and adviser, Ibrahim Kalin, told Reuters news the project would “certainly” attract investors and creditors when tenders are held soon.
Garanti Bank declined to comment. Is Bank and Yapi Kredi did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
DenizBank and state-owned VakifBank also declined to comment on the canal’s financing while Akbank and state lenders Halkbank and Ziraat Bank did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The cost of the canal would eclipse other megaprojects such as Istanbul’s vast new airport that have defined Erdogan’s legacy of credit-driven growth.
Massive foreign short-term debt worth some $150bn for banks and companies has dogged the lira and laid bare the risks of Turkey’s depleted foreign exchange reserves.
A currency crisis in 2018 delayed the canal project but it is back on the agenda as the economy rebounds from the coronavirus pandemic and the government approved development plans last month.
In an interview on Sunday, Erdogan’s adviser Kalin said there was already interest in the bidding that would be open to all including Turkish, European, American and Chinese firms.
“It’s a profitable project … and we are positive it will move forward,” he told Reuters news agency.
But for most of Turkey’s banks, especially lenders with European backers and those involved in loan syndications, the risks would likely be too high, the sources said.
They said taking on such a large project could limit their capacity to carry out further loan syndications while there was also a risk the project could be torpedoed at a later stage.
“No Turkish bank, neither state nor private, could take that risk,” said a former senior banker.
Turkey’s environment ministry has carried out environmental assessments that cleared the way for the project to proceed.
But European backers of Turkish banks would probably not see a Turkish environmental stamp of approval as credible, the former banker said.
“This is one of those white elephants. Other than land price speculation, it is hard to see any value in it,” he said.
The canal would destroy a marine ecosystem and basins that provide nearly a third of Istanbul’s fresh water, according to the Union of Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects.
Moscow is concerned the canal might not be covered by the Montreux Convention that restricts foreign warships’ access to the Black Sea through the Bosphorus Strait.
A Turkish official said in 2019 that the new canal would not be covered by the convention, which dates back to 1936.
This month, amid a build-up of Russia’s navy near Ukraine, the Kremlin said President Vladimir Putin told Erdogan on a call that the convention must be observed.
A fourth banker also said that because opposition parties oppose the project, construction could halt if Erdogan’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) is ousted. Presidential elections are set for 2023.
“The size of the project is tremendously big. It has reputational risks and loan risk,” the person said. “It also still seems like government’s pet project.”